Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:06

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
The Biggest Pros And Cons Of Dodge's Hemi Engine - Jalopnik
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
New questions emerge from the new charges in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case - NBC News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do Trump supporters like Andrew and Tristan Tate?
What’s next?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why did my bipolar girlfriend split up with me?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Would you date/marry a guy younger than you? If no, why not?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
When will dating stop being so hard for Gen Z?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why does a narcissist act like it's nothing when they hurt you?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Snowflake to acquire database startup Crunchy Data - TechCrunch